Speak Out Against Frozen Sushi - New Ontario Healt...
«
»
Image 1 of 5


Author: Sushi Lover
Started: September 29, 2004, 7:36:39 pm
Target: Sushi Lovers - Ontario
Supporters:

49
Goal:

5,000
Goal Progress:

1% Complete
Status

Active
I oppose the new Provincial Health Regulations that require sushi to be pre-frozen before cooking and serving.
Pre-freezing raw fish will spoil the taste and the dining experience. As a result, restaurants across Ontario will feel the economic impact of diners going elsewhere. Customers will be left with fewer restaurant choices. Further,medical authorities agree that serving non-frozen raw sushi poses no immediate health threats and there have been no disease or infectious outbreaks in Ontario resulting from the practice.
I join other Ontario diners in demanding that Provincial Health Authorities and Toronto food inspectors rescind the pre-freezing regulation and desist from enforcing it upon restaurant owners and fish mongers.

******

Below is the Sept. 29th Toronto Star Article for background on this issue:

Toronto sushi chefs and restaurant owners face tough new health rules banning the use of fresh raw fish.

But city health inspectors are giving them a three-month reprieve before they start enforcing the regulations requiring the fish to be frozen first.

Provincial health authorities said the regulations were not prompted by any immediate health threat, but, after a lengthy review process, were brought about in the interest of public health.

The change took place at the beginning of September to bring Ontario up to national and U.S. health codes, said Dr. Karim Kurji, Ontario's associate chief medical officer of health.

But the changes have created a flap in a city that loves its sushi.

Gus Nikoletsos, owner of the City Fish Market at Dufferin St. and Lawrence Ave., said, "Nobody's happy about this, not the restaurants, not the customers, not the suppliers."

And some infectious disease experts questioned the rationale behind the move.

Dr. Jay Keystone, of the University Health Network's tropical disease unit, said he doesn't understand the reason for the changes, adding severe sickness from a parasite coming from raw sushi is rather rare.

"Although, I do believe in preventive medicine and public health, I'm not sure why this would be a priority," he said.

The public health department has done a great job in our province, he said. "But this particular issue seems to be a non-issue for a parasite ... that we almost never see."

Freezing raw fish is an effective way to remove parasites.

According to Health Canada, Ontario is the first province to take this kind of a step. The Canadian Food Inspection System recommended the changes to the handling of raw fish in the late 1990s, said Health Canada spokesperson Margot Geduld. "Each province can decide to incorporate the recommendations as they see fit," she said.

Worldwide, there are 50 million people with infections attributed to eating raw fish, explained Kurji. In Japan, you actually see a condition called anisakiasis, associated with eating raw fish. The condition can be quite serious, Kurji said, causing victims "to roll about with pain, with nausea, vomiting, etc. One would probably require endoscopic intervention to remove the worms."

"In Quebec, we had an outbreak in 1996 where 17 people were affected from eating raw river fish," he said.

However, infectious disease experts in Toronto can't recall any documented cases of people becoming seriously ill with parasites after eating raw sushi.

Keystone said he can't recall any problems in Toronto arising from raw fish used in sushi. "It baffles me this is an issue when we've never seen a case."

Raw seafood can make you sick, but it is "really unusual" to get a life-threatening illness from sushi, said Dr. Allison McGeer, a microbiologist and infectious disease consultant at Mount Sinai Hospital.

Across Toronto yesterday, sushi chefs and restaurant owners whose menus feature raw fish, sashimi, fish tartare, ceviche, cold-smoked fish, and other uncooked seafood items — food favoured by a huge cross-section of the city's diners — were angered over the changes.

"It's the biggest problem I've faced in 20 years in the business, absolutely overwhelming," said John Lee, owner and chef at Omi, a popular Japanese restaurant on Church St.

"The freezing and thawing process would cause discoloration and ruin the taste and texture of the fish, since the jagged ice particles that melt during the thawing process would leave most seafood spongy, sitting in smelly juice," he said.

All fish would be affected, Lee continued, though oilier varieties such as tuna and salmon would stand up better to freezing than most white fish.

The regulation changes seemed to catch everyone — diners, restaurant owners, even Toronto Public Health officials — by surprise.

Jim Chan, manager of the Toronto Public Health food safety program, said that's why city restaurant owners are getting a three-month reprieve before health officials start enforcing the rules.

"For the first three months, we are doing an education phase, in which during a routine inspection the inspector will introduce this information to the operators," said Chan.

He said restaurant operators could handle the change by dealing with suppliers who will give them a document or invoice certifying the fish has been frozen according to regulation.

George Jung, owner of Pisces Seafood, a high-end fishmonger on Yonge St. near Rosedale, said the problem is not with the freshness of most of the raw fish that's sold in Toronto restaurants, but with the way it is handled, cut and transported.

"There are so many sushi restaurants in this city now, a couple on every block, and so few chefs who are properly trained," he said. "Freezing the fish will do absolutely nothing to solve the problem. It can be frozen and improperly defrosted, then handled and cut by untrained or mediocre chefs who haven't taken proper hygiene precautions. That's the real issue. I've seen tuna cut and filleted on the back of a truck in a dirty alley behind a restaurant.

"That's where the trouble starts."




Acne Life Insurance Death Insurance Bextra Asbestos Car Insurance Dental Plans 0 Private Jets Debt Consolidation credit Cards Rewards Cards Equity Loans Equity Line credit Loans Mortgages Pay Day Loans Cash Advance 0 Bankruptcy Reduce Debt Refinance Jet Charter Vioxx Wrongful death Legal Advice Taxes Investing Bonds 0 Online Trading IRA Rollover Refinance Quotes Adult Education Distance Learning Alcohol Treatment Rehab Drug Rehab Spyware Cell Phone Plans 0 Calling Cards VOIP Weight Loss Canadian Pharmacy Depression Spam Filter Lasik Facelift Teeth Whitening Annuity 0 Anti Virus Protection Adult Diaper Free credit Report credit Score Satellite Anti Spam Software Dedicated Hosting Domain Name Need Money Bachelor Degree 0 Master Degree Doctorate Degree Work at Home Quick Book Extra Money Eloan Malpractice Lawyer Lenox China Cancer Payperclick 0 Personal Injury Attorney Lexington Law Video Conferencing Transfer Money Windstar Cruise Casinos Online Term Life Online Banking Borrow Money Low Interest credit Cards 0 Personal Domain Name Cellular Phone Rental Internet Broker Trans Union Cheap Hosting University Degrees Online Online Marketing Consolidate Helpdesk Software Web Host 0 Homeowner's Insurance Yellow Page Advertising Travel Insurance Register Domain credit Counseling Email Hosting Business credit Consumer credit Blue Cross Laptop Computer
Sign this Petition!    Spread the Word!



Discussion Forum
View all Topics Start a New Topic
There are no discussion topics, would you like to post one?

Signatures
On_My_Soap_Box said 06/23/09, 9:56 am (unverified)
I support this petition. すし is meant to be fresh... Thats the whole point of it... Freezing it makes no sesne. It also puts diners at more risk... If it isn\'t thawed properly there is more chance of food poisoning... So, keep sushi fresh!
#49

Heather Uchman said 09/29/08, 3:22 pm (verified)
What? Freezing fresh fish? That totally disregards the whole point of wanting to eat sushi, how ridiculous.
#48

Richard Seguin said 09/29/08, 3:12 pm (verified)
It sounds to me like a better idea would be if the health unit did their job and made sure the food was safe when prepared properly. Instead of this economy crippling band-aid solution.
#47

Romain said 05/13/08, 7:16 am (verified)
I support this petition.
#46

Jaclyn Kung said 06/13/07, 1:54 pm (verified)
I support this petition.
#45

Jitka Varley said 04/14/07, 4:17 am (verified)
Having lived in Japan for many years and fallen in love with the taste of sushi, it is so disappointing to eat what is now served here. The texture is just not the same.
#44

Huguette said 04/24/06, 3:51 pm (verified)
Is there also a law for freezing steak tartar? I support this petition.
#43

Gerald Lam said 09/03/05, 2:25 am (verified)
No freezing of fresh fish! I commend the government for trying to be careful after SARs but please, not with fear mongering where no correlation exists.
#42

Charlie Foster said 01/03/05, 5:58 am (verified)
I don't eat sushi much more then once a month but even i can notice a slight difference. I don't see why the should have to frezze it!
#41

Luke Hollins said 11/26/04, 7:22 pm (verified)
I support this petition.
#40

Denice Grant said 11/25/04, 1:36 am (verified)
This will have an impact on restaurant businesses akin to SARS. Kindly recognize that for thousands of years raw fish has been consumed and we are blessed to have such a healthy option of food.
#39

Dylan Mawson said 11/24/04, 12:04 pm (verified)
This is an absolutely ridiculous move on the part of the Ontario government. There is no scientific basis for this law. The government is ruining sushi in Ontario for all of us. Please repeal this law before the sushi industry in Ontario is irreperably damaged.
#38

David Gannon said 11/22/04, 2:16 pm (verified)
Sushi from fresh fish has been part of a healthy diet for Japanese for centries, and worldwide for decades. There have been no significant health problems experienced in Ontario, so legislation is unnecerssary and repressive.
#37

jack robinson said 11/20/04, 9:45 am (verified)
Fuck the government.. they have nothing better to go that take peoples life, business, and success away.. i think when paul martin came to be pm we got some weird laws.. **** him vote him down
#36

a murase said 11/08/04, 10:04 pm (verified)
Dear sir and madam in up there.give me break! Eat raw fish is much healthier than eat burned steak.If you do this,I have to something to you because you take out good healthier life from me.
#35

Nicci said 11/08/04, 8:21 am (verified)
I support this petition.
#34

Michael H. said 11/07/04, 4:01 pm (verified)
In my opinion (as well as everyone else's opinion I'm sure) freezing the fish before serving sushi makes it taste much more awful. If no one has been "sushi-poisoned" what are the chances it will EVER happen? This is just a silly ridiculous law that should be gotten rid of. It will give us back the original taste of the food we love.
#33

Tomiko Tabuchi said 11/06/04, 8:44 pm (verified)
There's no need for this new law. I've been eating raw fish for over 50 years and nothing has ever happened. Why now?
#32

Robyn Holmes said 11/06/04, 8:42 pm (verified)
I do not believe that they are even considering banning raw fish based on the risk of a parasite. We haven't banned chicken for salmonella yet have we? Why the RISK of illness, when the Illness from poorly handled chicken and other poultry causes illness regularly? This is ridiculous and should not be considered.
#31

Marcia Greene said 10/27/04, 5:41 pm (verified)
Have they run out of legitamate health threats to concern themselves with?
#30