Want to start a free online petition? All you have to do is fill out our simple petition form to get started. Petition Spot is the leading online petition site and if you don't know how to write a petition, we will show you examples of how to make a petition. We have many promotional tools avalible that will help you promote your petition getting as many people as possible to sign your petition.
Start A Petition
Members Area

Related




Created by Chris Nolan on 24 September 2005 @ 5:40:42 PM
discuss in forums
This petition is electronically signed and submitted to Congress by the people of the United States Of America.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Peoples' Rights and Second and Tenth Amendment Restoration Act of 2006'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

(a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS:

(1) Domestic Violence remains a very serious problem in the United States. It is a dangerous crime and should be punished as such, including, where appropriate, as a felony.

(2) Many States have classified Domestic Violence crimes as misdemeanors, others as felonies. States are the proper authority, rather than the Federal Government, to classify Domestic Violence offenses.

(3) Where appropriate, States should classify Domestic Violence offenses as a felony.

(4) Section 658 of Public Law 104-208, commonly referred to as the Lautenberg amendment, oversteps Federal authority, violating States' rights, because no nexus has been shown to exist between Domestic Violence and interstate commerce.

(5) The Lautenberg amendment does not deal with a subject delegated to Congress under article I, section 8 of the Constitution of the United States and is therefore unconstitutional under the tenth amendment to the Constitution, as interpreted by United States v. Lopez.

(6) The Lautenberg amendment oversteps Congress's power to regulate commerce as delineated by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

(7) Some of the strictest gun control laws are found in cities where the number of incidents of guns being used in violent crimes is the highest. Therefore, the Lautenberg amendment does not reduce incidents of domestic violence.

(8) State and Federal judges already have the power to deny persons convicted of misdemeanors the right to possess firearms as a condition of probation or parole.

(9) The Lautenberg amendment is an unfunded Federal mandate because States are liable for the costs of monitoring those citizens who have been banned for life from owning a firearm. Many times this lifetime ban is a result of a misdemeanor, not a felony.

(10) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 violates all notions of constitutional due process and constitutes an ex post facto law because it imposes a criminal penalty on crimes which were not subject to that penalty at the time of the Act.

(11) Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year. Of these self-defense cases, as many as 200,000 are by women defending themselves against sexual assault.

(12) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 will, if allowed to stand, result in the disarming of millions of citizens, including women, on account of misdemeanor offenses which, in many cases, were committed long before the effective date of that Act.

(13) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 will, in many cases, disarm battered women who need access to firearms in order to protect themselves from their battering spouses as well as from common criminals.

(14) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 will, if allowed to stand, impose a lifetime gun ban on persons who committed acts so minor that they were not even entitled to a jury trial prior to conviction.

(15) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208, will, if allowed to stand, result in the disarming and dismissal of a significant number of law enforcement officers and American servicemen, on account of misdemeanors, which in many cases, were committed long before the effective date of that Act.

(16) Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 ignores the real problem surrounding domestic violence in that truly violent offenders are allowed to plea-bargain down to misdemeanors.

(b) PURPOSE- It is the purpose of this Act to restore States' rights, the tenth amendment, and second amendment freedoms.

SEC. 3. REPEALER.

Section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 is repealed and is null and void as if it had not been enacted, and all provisions of law amended by such section are restored as if section 658 had not been enacted.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall take effect as if included in the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208. Any liability, penalty, or forfeiture incurred by any person by reason of the application of any amendment made by section 658 of the Treasury-Postal portion of Public Law 104-208 is hereby extinguished, and any action or prosecution for the enforcement of any such liability, penalty, or forfeiture shall not be sustained.

(BY SIGNING THIS PETITION YOU AGREE THAT NO INFORMATION WILL BE SHARED OR USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE THAN TO EXPRESS YOUR OPINION ON THE CONTENTS OF THIS PETITION) a1580082

Added On (2007-05-09):

I have chosen to close this Petition and send the Signatures I have to my Congress. If anyone wishes to sponsor their own petition, I will gladly spread the word. I can be emailed through this petition. Thank You all who have signed. I had hoped to get a lot more signatures in the 2 Years I ran this Petition.

Added On (2007-08-04):

As I am still getting signatures, I will postpone sending this petition in for a while longer.

Added On (2008-04-18):

CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED
Sign this Petition


This petition is closed and signatures are no longer accepted.

Petition Details

Share this Petition Target: United States Congress
Category: Government & Politics
Total Signatures: 446
Signature Goal: 1000

Contact Creator of Petition
Print Preview

Petition Signatures
446 James Ludolph This is a horrible law. I am amazed that 9 of the 11 circuit courts have upheld it. Only 1 the 4th circuit is examined the grammar which was used to write the law. Hopefully the Supreme court will weigh in on the fact that it is unconstitutional (US v. Hayes) I plead guilty to M3 simple assault. which in Pennsylvania is a argument or scuffle between consenting parties. The definition said nothing about domestic violence with in the crimes code. I was never told that I had just surrender my 2nd amendment rights until I went to apply for a carry permit 5 years later. In fact the District attorney and my own attorney explained to me that it was just a matter of paying a fine. I am horrified as I spent 10 years in the military and now work for the Department of Defense as a civilian employee. What makes it worse is that it is retro active to anyone who before 96 plead guilty to any other crime that involves family members. If that is not screwed up what is? Gee why isn't the ACLU up in arms over this? I wonder...
445 j.d. wolf No misdemeanor conviction of any kind, should ever restrict anyone's constitutional right to own firearms.
444 Tim Steers My gun is on hold with my FFL until the justice dept. get my court transcripts from1990 which had nothing to do with Domestic Violense and can't give me a time when this should accure. So there is no limitations how long they can hold your Gun while you wait?
443 Frank Soldiers are effected and good lawmen
442 William McLelland I am a retired United Airlines Captain. Call 911 after you protect yourself!
441 scott kielian
440 William G Sims I am an honorablly discharged vetran who waived my right to trial and pleaded guilty to a misdemnour domestic charge and have lost my civil liberties because of THIS? I wish I would have not served one day in the defense of our country . So much for freedom!
439 Kevin Bunn
438 Kelly Bunn
437 Daniel Barton
436 chadwick Van Love All I want is a chance to serve my country.
435 Kevin Molz There is no such thing as a constitutional gun control law. Repeal them all!
434 Jeff Duvall
433 Miles King
432 Kelly H. Bielefeldt The Lautenberg Amendment is Unconstitutional. This amendment is preventing me from serving my country because of a rediculous gun control law that has no bearing what so ever on military service.
431 Michael Rios
430 ashley alburtis
429 Steven Huidg This was my ex girlfriends way of keeping me from re-enlisting in the Marine Corps.
428 Jeff Guetter This law has unfairly hurt too many!
427 Mike Leonetti
426 Jonathan Owens i am tired of the government doing anything they can to infringe on our 2nd ammendment rights!!!
425 Richard Noe
424 Franklin E Smith III
423 steve latimer
422 Pauliane Kalauokaaea-Kahe
421 Keith H. Baldwin Hope I'm not too late?
420 scott kazel This law gives a lifetime punishment for simple mistakes that are far less dangerous than theft, drugs and violence.
419 Jeffrey P. Reed So UN-Constitutional!!!
418 Douglas Danker
417 JEFF WILLIAMSON GOOGLE SEARCH:renegade movement
416 Christopher Smoak I want to join the US Army but his law is stupid.
415 Timothy Paquin
414 Steve Roerick I did something stupid like shoving and smashing my own belongings to be convicted of a domestic with violence. I ahve not been in trouble since, which is over ten years, I am currently in a criminal justice program and understand how most of us got screwed. I feel that this amendment needs to be repealed because of how and who it effects. I payed my dent to the court and society and know i can't own or possess a firearm again. Because I made an immature mistake ate the just turned age of 18. What makes this amendment even sicker is the fact that they snuck it it as it had nothing to do with the piece of legislation that it was hidden in. Is this not a criminal act of deceit? Who are the real criminals, it gets harder and harder to tell these days!
413 kevin walker Let's get er done
412 Kelly Cole I am In the military and have been convicted of a domestic violence misdemeanor from trying to leave the situation I was in and deffending myself. I am active duty military. I have never been in trouble with the law or military until now. This is my livelyhood and my way of life. If I can't posses a firearm I will lose my career. I believe that this amendment should be repealed. This amendment could ruin my life as well as my son's. He doesn't deserve that because he had no control over what happened. He did not ask for any of this but he might have to pay for it. It's not fair to good people
411 Patrick Havlin
410 Michael C. LaFever
409 chris castro people change as they grow and some dont what i mean is if i was to commit this act when i was 18, what do you think of me when i am 35, there is a big difference and the lawmakers fail to see this, but they make everything else work in there interest, lets make it work for all the men and women out there that are in the military fighting for this country to allow stupid things to continue to happen
408 Tracy L. Clark I don't think that ti is fair and just for the government to be able to violate our constitutional right for anything short of crimes with a firearm. If the family violence occured with a gun present I could understand. Otherwise I should be able to have my right to bear arms
407 James Davis The law is unconstitutional. If nothing else, it should not be retroactive. Prior to the law enactment, those that plead no contest would never have done so if it was known that you would be giving up a constitutional right.
406 Bill Cooper
405 johnny gilbert
404 Lisa Kordich This law is unconstitutional and should be repealed.
403 Patrick Medarac
402 Bob Tamburello
401 John Hughes
400 tamara bashaw
399 John
398 Beth Leslie Change the law's
397 David Duffey