Petition to Reject Rezoning/Special Use Permit App...
Feed
«
»
Image 1 of 4


Author: Eric Groussman
Started: December 2, 2005, 2:26:09 am
Target: Gwinnett County Planning Commission/Board of Commissioners
Category: Government & Politics
Supporters:

4
Goal:

50
Goal Progress:

8% Complete
Status

Active
We, the undersigned, bring forth this petition to the Gwinnett County Planning Commission and to the Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners, for the purpose of signifying the community opposition to any approval of Rezoning/Special Use Permit Application SUP-05-078.

We petition that the application be rejected on the grounds of:

Development plan exceeds CSO Density
guidelines. Reference Section 1316(7)(A)

Entrance to development creates
additional traffic hazard to community.
Said entrance is in curve already marked
by county road warning sign.

Development plan does not provide proper
ecological safeguards to ensure common
watershed water quality.

Development plan is not in line with
historical development trend of neighboring
community or developments.

Development plan is a detriment to the
neighboring community, provides no value
add,but increases traffic hazards, reduces
current green space, reduces community
property value,and put increased burden
on education system and public utilities.






Acne Life Insurance Death Insurance Bextra Asbestos Car Insurance Dental Plans 0 Private Jets Debt Consolidation credit Cards Rewards Cards Equity Loans Equity Line credit Loans Mortgages Pay Day Loans Cash Advance 0 Bankruptcy Reduce Debt Refinance Jet Charter Vioxx Wrongful death Legal Advice Taxes Investing Bonds 0 Online Trading IRA Rollover Refinance Quotes Adult Education Distance Learning Alcohol Treatment Rehab Drug Rehab Spyware Cell Phone Plans 0 Calling Cards VOIP Weight Loss Canadian Pharmacy Depression Spam Filter Lasik Facelift Teeth Whitening Annuity 0 Anti Virus Protection Adult Diaper Free credit Report credit Score Satellite Anti Spam Software Dedicated Hosting Domain Name Need Money Bachelor Degree 0 Master Degree Doctorate Degree Work at Home Quick Book Extra Money Eloan Malpractice Lawyer Lenox China Cancer Payperclick 0 Personal Injury Attorney Lexington Law Video Conferencing Transfer Money Windstar Cruise Casinos Online Term Life Online Banking Borrow Money Low Interest credit Cards 0 Personal Domain Name Cellular Phone Rental Internet Broker Trans Union Cheap Hosting University Degrees Online Online Marketing Consolidate Helpdesk Software Web Host 0 Homeowner's Insurance Yellow Page Advertising Travel Insurance Register Domain credit Counseling Email Hosting Business credit Consumer credit Blue Cross Laptop Computer
Sign this Petition!    Spread the Word!




Discussion Forum
View all Topics Start a New Topic
There are no discussion topics, would you like to post one?

Signatures
Patsy M. Morris said 12/02/05, 9:39 pm (verified)
Development plan is not consistent with the development patterns in the area. The density that is being requested could lead to the encroachment of higher densities into the area. The development of the adjacent tracts (East,West, North,South) are all Single Family Homes on much larger lots. The proposed plan does not provide adequate common open space to include but not limited to parks and or receational and or playground areas, trails and nature preserves for the residents. Nor, does the plan specify sufficient details and design plans for adequate fencing and landscaped buffers on the perimeter property lines, especially on the West established adjacent tract of land where the Single Family Home Subdivision is located closest to the proposed development.
#4

Pat Hogan said 12/02/05, 2:53 am (verified)
Development as proposed is inappropriate to the existing neighborhood.
#3

Billy J. Hall said 12/02/05, 2:30 am (verified)
The houses in this development should be in keeping with surrounding neighborhoods which should be minimum 1/2 acre lots with minimum 3 sided brick structures. Parkwood Road is extremely curvy and not designed to handle the additional heavy traffic.
#2

Evelyn D. Hall said 12/02/05, 2:26 am (verified)
It is imperative that this development be in line with the existing neighboring communities. The traffic conditions for this development also need close scrutiny.
#1