| 351 |
13 Jun 2005 - 11:46
Joanne Holt :
This is the second time this week I have heard of an AKC Judge braking
AKC's rules. Nothing is done. What is going on at AKC? |
| 352 |
13 Jun 2005 - 12:04
Barbara Murray :
I'm disappointed with AKC's inaction in this case. |
| 353 |
13 Jun 2005 - 12:42
N. DeNike :
|
| 354 |
13 Jun 2005 - 13:03
Lani McKennon :
This is NOT the way to improve breeding stock, or benefit the breed
specifically. |
| 355 |
13 Jun 2005 - 13:25
Cheryl Okosun :
I was suspect of the AKC playing politics. Now I know for sure. How can
you condone her theft and neutering and allow her to continue to
participate in AKC??? Your organization's credibility has hit a
new LOW..shame on you! |
| 356 |
13 Jun 2005 - 15:05
Teresa S :
|
| 357 |
13 Jun 2005 - 15:59
Christopher Carson :
This is a sad state of affairs to hear about. I can't understand
suspension of lesser offenses, but not for felony theft and damage to
property. Besides this, what could be more cruel to the animal and the
owner than to deprive the pair of potential future champions. Shame on AKC
for not taking action on such a heinus disrespect of another members rights
or infringement thereof. |
| 358 |
13 Jun 2005 - 17:55
Linda Haggstrom :
|
|
|
| 359 |
13 Jun 2005 - 18:43
Huntly Hashagen :
theft and neutering of a fellow AKC member's dog is clearly
prejudical to the interest of the AKC and the sport of purebred dogs
|
| 360 |
13 Jun 2005 - 18:49
Penny Spencer :
|
| 361 |
13 Jun 2005 - 19:10
DOLORES M. ECKHART :
|
| 362 |
13 Jun 2005 - 19:23
susa paige :
unbelievable. This is outrages and by not confronting the issue head on,
makes me wonder what the "new" AKC is all about. $? |
| 363 |
13 Jun 2005 - 19:29
Michelle Scheanou :
Is the AKC all about $$...I question this. |
| 364 |
13 Jun 2005 - 19:59
Jaquelin K. Greene :
I believe teh AKC needs to rethink this situation. Theft of a beloved pet,
whether show, champion, or pet, warrants suspension at the very least - in
my opinion they should be banned for life from membership. |
| 365 |
13 Jun 2005 - 20:00
Joyce W.D. :
|
| 366 |
13 Jun 2005 - 20:23
Lisa Conley :
|
| 367 |
13 Jun 2005 - 20:24
Brendon Conley :
|
| 368 |
13 Jun 2005 - 20:29
Bea :
If you dont like the decision that AKC made, well mabye we should all show
them who AKC is, don't go to a show for 2 month, then they will see
who is in power. |
| 369 |
13 Jun 2005 - 20:33
Richard Winker :
|
| 370 |
13 Jun 2005 - 20:34
Salome D. Winker-LaRoche :
|
| 371 |
13 Jun 2005 - 20:37
Scott Bunker :
The AKC has shown their true position with this decision; pathetic,
passive, political. |
| 372 |
13 Jun 2005 - 20:51
Linda Czado :
AKC needs to suspend Clover Hedlund A.S.A.P. This is appauling!! I will
send this petition to everyone I know that was considering AKC registration
including myself. AKC needs to suspend Ms. Hedlund's
priviledge's for life. Until then, AKC will NOT see the likes of
me or my friends. Something will be done! DO YOUR JOB, AKC!! |
| 373 |
13 Jun 2005 - 21:04
Shelley Owen :
|
| 374 |
13 Jun 2005 - 21:21
John Shoemaker :
|
| 375 |
13 Jun 2005 - 21:52
Diane Suman :
The AKC is really losing its credibility with the dog fancy. This is not
the first case of this kind of action, and the inability of AKC to take
positive action against these people reprehensible. |
| 376 |
13 Jun 2005 - 21:54
Doris Harrison :
|
| 377 |
13 Jun 2005 - 22:02
Karen Massey :
I beleave AKC should suspened her membership for life.How can we trust that
our dogs won't be stolen by this evil lady at future shows? |
| 378 |
13 Jun 2005 - 22:17
Sherry :
|
| 379 |
13 Jun 2005 - 22:22
Marina Renee Lara, DVM :
It is hard to believe that AKC can turn an eye on such a blatant act of
misconduct. If this is true AKC board members should be embarassed to be
seen in public. |
| 380 |
13 Jun 2005 - 22:33
Sara Futh :
Unless a person co-own3eed a dog and had reasons for not ewanting it used
for breeding, they have no right to neuter the dog, adn thi is apparently
NOT the case. - as for stealing it, sine the fact was roven in court, AKC
should back that decision by suspension. |
| 381 |
13 Jun 2005 - 22:37
Cindy Lowe :
AKC, the premier dog club in the US, is muddying their status in the minds
of both the public eye and that of dog fanciers by not standing behind
their own rules. One would have to ask why? And while there could
potentailly be several the one that comes to mind first is money. Its no
wonder that we are losing both breeders and registrant's to other
registries. If some other registry were to ever organize itself enough to
start a show circiut, heaven help AKC. |
| 382 |
13 Jun 2005 - 22:37
Rolan E. Anderson :
Unless I am badly mistaken, AKC principles require action in a case as
blatant as this. |
| 383 |
13 Jun 2005 - 22:47
melissa white :
|
| 384 |
13 Jun 2005 - 22:59
Lynette Sylvester :
The facts speak for itself. I am dissapointed with the AKC's
handling of this situation. |
| 385 |
13 Jun 2005 - 23:05
Barbara Jeleski :
|
| 386 |
13 Jun 2005 - 23:16
Christine Farnell :
|
| 387 |
13 Jun 2005 - 23:16
Mary L Ward :
|
| 388 |
13 Jun 2005 - 23:20
Suzanne Warfield :
Wake up AKC! You're sleeping on the job. This is an obvious
lifetime suspension |
| 389 |
13 Jun 2005 - 23:26
Linda Sallee-Hill :
If this is true-AKC, you need to do your job. You did not when my
signature was forged and you did not follow thru with your rules - this is
MUCH worse. |
| 390 |
13 Jun 2005 - 23:29
Anne Petersen :
Unbelievable! |
| 391 |
13 Jun 2005 - 23:30
Ann Gilbert :
I cannot believe that AKC would allow such a travesty to continue! This
woman was convicted of FELONY theft of a dog - it that doesn't
violate the AKC's purpose I don't know what will. |
| 392 |
13 Jun 2005 - 23:32
F L Martin :
If theft is not a reason to suspend, what is?
PLEASE rethink your stand on this matter. |
| 393 |
14 Jun 2005 - 0:02
CAROLYN WADDELL :
AKC NEEDS TO RECONSIDER IT'S OPINION TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING
IN THE FUTURE. |
| 394 |
14 Jun 2005 - 0:15
Vicki Loucks :
|
| 395 |
14 Jun 2005 - 0:41
Shirley Schaffer :
Holy smokes!! Sounds like the AKC has been neutered! |
| 396 |
14 Jun 2005 - 0:52
Laura Malasig :
In consideration of Clover Hedland's wrongful acts and the civil
suit that is pending, it would be advisable for the AKC to rethink their
position on the matter. |
| 397 |
14 Jun 2005 - 0:56
Carolyn Crockett :
|
| 398 |
14 Jun 2005 - 0:56
Ann Musker :
Theft of the dog alone should be an undisputed lifetime suspension of AKC
priviledges of the offender, but neutering as well? Why should there be
any doubt about what the AKC should do in this matter? By letting this go,
is the AKC not setting a prescident for others to commit this very same
crime in the future? Please look into this matter further,and I hope the
AKC will come to the right decision. |
| 399 |
14 Jun 2005 - 1:15
Toni Griffith :
AKC should heed the courts suggestion and suspend Clover Hedlund, UNLESS
they wish to appear in agreement with her actions. |
| 400 |
14 Jun 2005 - 1:39
G CURRAN :
HECK, YEARS AGO AKC SUSPENDED AND FINED ME FOR SIGNING THE CO OWNERS NAME
ON ONE OF MY DOGS. THE CO-OWNER HAD VANISHED AND COULD NOT BE CONTACTED.
SHE HAD BEEN INSTITUTIONALIZED AND HER DOGS NEGLECTED AND SHE WAS FOUND
GUILTY OF ABUSE...THUS AKC SUSPENDED HER. I HAD NO KNOWLEGE OF THIS. I
FESSED UP TO SIGNING HER NAME....YET STILL GOT MY HAND SLAPPED. AND
HEDLUND IS NOT SUSPENDED???? HMMMM |
