Asking citizens to use non-free OSes in order to follow the activities of the EU Council is asking them to withdraw their freedom in order to be full fledged citizens.
Is freedom a danger?
There are (too) many video formats to choose from; selecting one which is not generally available shows a lack of knowledge by the responsible persons.
This is poor, an multinational goverment association which discriminates the population and does not guarantee the right for information for its members and non-mebers.
Lorsqu'on diffuse une oeuvre on prend un risque que des tiers non autorisés en prennent connaissance. C'est aux ayants droits de mettre en oeuvre des procédures techniques adaptées au contexte.
Své daně neplatím proto, aby Unie podporovala velké firmy z USA. Pokud se má někdy EU dostat na vlastní nohy, musí pro to něco začít dělat a vzepřít se nadnárodní lobby.
visiblement, vous faites tout pour....
Ceci aura au moins l'avantage de me conforter dans mon choix du refus de votre constitution.je suis pour l'Europe, et contre votre europe d'apparence démocratique
Proprietary formats are against public interest. They should never be used and should be outlawed. To own a format is like to own a language, a word, an expression.
It's sad to know that the European Union on one side tries to stop Microsoft from abusing of its dominant position in the market, but on the other side strengthens its monopoly using its proprietary file format that discriminates Linux, BSD, Solaris and other operative system users.
The solution is using a free (as in "free speech") file format like Ogg-Theora.
