<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>PETITION DEMANDING A FULL INVESTIGATION OF THE THE...</title>
		<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/</link>
		<description>The questions that we the People NEED to have answered and NOW, are:

Why did Sandy Berger risk severe jail time to steal the documents in the first place?

Who was behind these thefts? Who ordered him to do it?

Were Bill and Hillary Clinton involved, and if so, to what extent?

What documents did he steal and why? Who was he protecting?

Why is the Bush administration Justice Department refusing to administer the lie detector examination to Berger, per his plea agreement and why did they allow him to get off so easy?

Why didn&rsquo;t the F.B.I or the Justice Department notify the 911 Commission that Berger was under investigation for the thefts, before he testified before the commission?

What exactly is being hidden from the American people? And don&rsquo;t tell us that information is classified due to national security because that is crock and we are not buying it.

We DEMAND that you, our government gets to the bottom of this whole affair, and we DEMAND that Sen. Hillary Clinton WITHDRAW from the 2008 presidential election campaign until we get truthful and complete answers as to her and her husbands involvement into all of this.

We do have a RIGHT to know what exactly is going on and who is involved. We have a RIGHT to DEMAND that all those involved be brought to justice. We should NOT and will NOT settle for the excuse, &ldquo;There is NO evidence&hellip;!&rdquo; This excuse is wearing too thin. There is evidence but it is being covered up and we are getting tired of it.

We DEMAND that a proper and full investigation of the Sandy Berger affair be conducted and that the people be told the TRUTH. After all, Rep. Pelosi promised that she and the Democrats would put an end to the corruption in government. Now it is time to hold her feet to the fire and live up to her promise. ENOUGH OF THIS BUSINESS AS USUAL and covering up major crimes involving high ranking government figures, NO MATTER WHO THEY ARE! What ever is being covered up could have very serious consequences for the American people, and yet no one in government seems to be the least bit interested in getting to the truth.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 3 Apr 2007 04:1:26 CDT</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<ttl>3</ttl>




		<item>
			<title>erm YEP</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3314519</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description>he&amp;amp;#39;s a crook resorting to further crime to cover his criminal tracks</description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Yes!</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3314509</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description>Sandy Burglar is a shady motherfucker and he obviously has lots to hide which is why he has to resort to crime and theft to voer his other illegal tracks.

The whole Clinton admin was just as ciminal as fuck.</description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Steve</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3280316</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description>This crime needs to be dealt with and dealt with now</description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Monica Rose</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3279951</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description></description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>spitfire</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3249457</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description>If he were a taxpaying citizen he&amp;amp;#39;d be in jail in a heartbeat. why is he treated so differently than anyone else????</description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Mark Maness</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3248379</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description></description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Dick Meharrd</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3233534</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description></description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>derick cooper</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3225327</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description></description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Gayle Szeredy</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3218704</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description>Regardless of whether a politician is a Democrat or a Republican, no politician should be able to walk away from this type of crime... and it is definitely a CRIME!</description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Michael Johnson</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3218140</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description>This is the biggest cover-up in American History, and it MUST be exposed.</description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Karen Krantzberg</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3214707</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description></description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Alan Stanford Thaddeus</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3214281</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description></description>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Very Rev. Fr. Gregori</title>
			<link>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/theftofdocuments/#sig3214002</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:0:00 CST</pubDate>
			<description>Whether or not a copy in the National Archives can be a &acirc;€śdocument,&acirc;€ť the fact remains that Berger was not charged with theft. Instead, the Justice Department apparently picked a minor charge and then &acirc;€śnegotiated&acirc;€ť the lightest penalty it could get away with &acirc;€“ leaving many of us to wonder if this is just a case of the federal government looking after one of its own.</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>